By Months: Tarmo Tamm

Total Months: 12

Fully Profiled: 12

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
10.2025

1 Speeches

Insufficient data.
Details View Details
09.2025

33 Speeches

Criticism has been leveled against the opposition's assertions that the draft legislation is detrimental or unfair to businesses. These claims were refuted by arguments emphasizing that the bill ensures fair competition and is fully compliant with EU law. Urmas Reinsalu faced especially harsh criticism for making inaccurate statements regarding correspondence sent to the commission, leading to accusations that he was deliberately misleading the public. The amendment proposed by the opposition (Andres Metsoja) was ultimately rejected on the grounds that it would violate EU law.
Details View Details
06.2025

1 Speeches

While there is no direct political confrontation, objections raised from outside the political system are being addressed. The opposition is directed at the stance of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Tallink, who argue that the draft bill is unconstitutional due to its adverse retroactive effect. The speaker is conveying the ministry’s position, which refutes this claim.
Details View Details
01.2025

1 Speeches

Criticism is directed at those challenging the wolf hunt, who are accused of creating fear and hatred of wolves and damaging the reputation of the national animal. The Minister of the Interior and the state's practice regarding the revocation of gun permits are also criticized, as this is disproportionate and endangers citizens loyal to the state.
Details View Details
12.2024

2 Speeches

There is no direct opposition or criticism; the speech focuses on finding solutions and improving legislation to meet the requirements of the court ruling.
Details View Details
11.2024

1 Speeches

No direct confrontation is expressed, but the current political balance is indirectly called into question, which has led to a situation where high environmental indicators are not reflected in economic success. The criticism is aimed at the imbalance of the policy, not at specific individuals or procedures.
Details View Details
10.2024

1 Speeches

There is no opposition, as the discussion centers on finding a consensual solution to the problem stemming from the European Court ruling. The debates focused more on finding the best technical solution (the IT system) rather than engaging in political confrontation.
Details View Details
09.2024

1 Speeches

Direct political opponents are neither named nor criticized. The criticism is aimed at outdated bureaucratic procedures (the 30-day deadline) and the notion that a larger number of officials solves problems faster.
Details View Details
06.2024

1 Speeches

While there is no direct confrontation, the speaker poses an indirect challenge to the feasibility of the government's economic plan, specifically questioning its realism. The criticism targets the substance and implementation of the policy, rather than individuals or procedural matters.
Details View Details
05.2024

1 Speeches

The primary criticism targets the bank tax proposal put forward by the Centre Party. This criticism is rooted in policy and values, labeling the proposal as populist, incompetent, and destabilizing. The speaker warns that the proposal would set a dangerous precedent for the retroactive taxation of other successful sectors, or even private individuals.
Details View Details
04.2024

3 Speeches

There is no direct opposition to specific political forces. Criticism is instead aimed at the state's current passivity, excessive bureaucracy, and the civil service's insufficient role in driving innovation.
Details View Details
03.2024

1 Speeches

No opposition exists. The speaker, conversely, emphasizes that no further questions arose and nothing was discussed, indicating a smooth and objection-free procedure.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling