By Plenary Sessions: Tarmo Tamm

The criticism is directed against the opposition, who claim that the bill is harmful and unfair to businesses. The speaker directly refutes these claims, noting that they "are thankfully not true." The critique is policy- and fact-based, focusing on assessing the regulation's actual impact.

Insufficient data.

The objection is directed at Andres Metsoja’s amendment proposal, which was rejected due to legal incompatibility with EU law and which would place Estonian entrepreneurs at a disadvantage. The speaker criticizes Urmas Reinsalu for presenting inaccurate claims regarding the letters received by the Commission, accusing him of "mixing some things up" and misleading [others].