By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Tali

The opposition is being sharply criticized for polarizing society and making unrealistic demands, especially regarding their desire to increase spending without making any changes to taxation. The speaker rejects the criticism leveled by the political opposition, accusing them of being unable to handle basic arithmetic or understand percentages. One specific party is directly criticized for seeking to sabotage the Rail Baltic project and wanting to exit the European Union, which is extremely unreasonable.

Insufficient data.

The speaker rejects and sharply criticizes the charge concerning the slow pace of legislative work, labeling it completely inappropriate and unfounded. The criticism is aimed at those who question the speed of the National Defense Committee’s operations, though no specific opposing party or individual is named.

The criticism targets the Financial Supervision Authority's operational readiness and its failure to establish plans for a large-scale crisis situation. The opposition focuses on institutional preparedness, demanding concrete evidence that well-thought-out action plans are actually in place.

There is not enough data.

No direct criticism is leveled against opponents, but the speaker does indirectly point out the deficiencies of earlier proposals. Previous legislative attempts are deemed inferior to the current draft bill, though the criticism is not aimed at specific individuals or groups.