By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler

The primary criticism targets the government and the coalition, accusing them of drafting poor and rushed legislation. A separate point of criticism focuses on the minister's dismissive behavior toward the parliamentary party (specifically, the refusal to introduce the candidate for Prosecutor General), which undermines the trustworthiness of the institutions. The criticism is grounded in both policy and procedure.

The primary targets are the ruling coalition and specific ministers/presenters (Tanel Kiik, Kristina Kallas). Criticism is aimed both at policy (excise tax hikes, budget shuffling) and procedures (the failure to review proposed amendments). The attacks are intense, offering no possibility of compromise, and calling for a change of government.

The disagreement centers on the specifics of the bill introduced by the minister. The criticism itself is rooted in policy and procedure, specifically focusing on the absence of earmarked guarantees. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, primarily demanding greater clarity.