By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler

The primary opponents are the Reform Party and the liberals, who face fierce criticism regarding their undemocratic tactics, falsehoods (tax hikes), and incompetent energy policy. The criticism is intense, spanning from major political issues (the cancellation of the 2.6 billion scheme) to direct challenges to personal competence (Igor Taro). There is no apparent willingness to seek a compromise.

The primary adversary is the governing coalition ("our good coalition partners"), who are sharply criticized for the expansion of voting rights and unreasonable legislative initiatives. The criticism is intense and is getting personal, accusing the coalition of being in a political "hangover" and warning of a bad outcome.

The main targets are the Prime Minister and Interior Minister Läänemets, who are accused of lying, talking nonsense, and making decisions detrimental to the state. The criticism is intense and covers both political aspects (business dealings with Russia, the budget, energy policy) and ethical aspects (a whiff of corruption, baseless accusations against allies). There is no willingness to compromise; direct accountability is being demanded.

The main opponents are members of the government, especially Interior Minister Läänemets, whose suitability for the post he sharply questions due to rhetoric attacking allies, calling him a "putinist." He also criticizes the hypocrisy of the "liberals" and their previous stances regarding the US administration (Mihkelson, Kaljulaid). The criticism is intense and focuses on the competence of the ministers and the damaging of allied relations.