By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler

The speaker demonstrates expertise in energy policy and financial matters, citing specific figures (15 TWh, the 2.6 billion scheme) and procedural details (state aid rules, the role of Sumitomo/Eesti Energia). Particular emphasis is placed on the inconsistency of government forecasts and the socialization of costs, demanding detailed justification for the rationale behind these decisions.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of constitutional matters and international law, specifically referencing the European Union Accession Treaty within the context of suffrage. Furthermore, the speaker utilizes cultural context, analyzing the symbolism present in the Republic Day concert performance as a political warning.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in Riigikogu procedural matters, demanding clarifications regarding the rules and number of questions allowed. Furthermore, they possess knowledge in the field of economic and energy policy, referencing the state of the budget and the 2.6 billion euro support package. To back up their positions, emphasis is placed on the opposition of "all experts" (economic and energy experts) to the government's hasty decisions.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in foreign policy and security matters, referencing specific events like the UN Middle East vote and previous debates regarding NATO and independent defense capability (Plan B). They use historical comparisons (Trump's election, Mart Helme's positions) to establish the political context. To support their argument, they directly quote social media posts from government members.