Agenda Profile: Rain Epler

The core political position involves strong opposition to the government's current green transition policy, particularly the restrictions placed on oil shale usage. The necessity of utilizing oil shale as a cheap and crucial reserve capacity is stressed, while simultaneously criticizing the construction of gas power plants as an unreasonable endeavor. Signs that the Reform Party is revising its views regarding the green transition and "woke ideology" are noted, which is viewed as a positive step toward normalcy. Political leadership is characterized as weak and inadequate, given that politicians are allowing state-owned companies and officials to dictate policy direction.

The speakers demonstrate expertise in energy policy, particularly regarding oil shale and gas power plant capacity (600 MW), as well as the financial mechanisms of electricity production. Technical terms such as "reserve capacity" and "quota trading" are used, clarifying the impact of administrative taxes on the price of fossil fuels. It is especially emphasized that fossil fuels are actually inexpensive, but administrative measures are what make them costly.

The rhetorical style is largely combative, critical, and skeptical, employing sarcasm and powerful metaphors ("the Simpletons," "the tax racket"). The Prime Minister's previous stances are passionately recalled, yet a shift in tone is also recognized, albeit skeptically. Logical arguments are stressed (concerning costs and governance), connecting them to criticism regarding the inadequacy of political leadership. The text concludes with a direct appeal to the Prime Minister to either revise his views more rapidly or relinquish control.

The speakers referenced previous debates with the Prime Minister, both on the floor of the Riigikogu and on television, demonstrating consistent involvement in high-level political disputes. Their pattern of activity includes submitting formal inquiries and repeatedly criticizing the government's energy policy. One speaker noted that it is their habit to always begin on a positive note.

The primary opponent is the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, who face criticism for the instability of their energy policy and weak political leadership. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of creating a bureaucratic state and fostering political uncertainty, where state-owned enterprises dictate policy. Additionally, there is personal criticism related to the appointment of the alleged friend Kasemets as State Secretary, which points to ethical and managerial failures.

Insufficient data.

The focus is on Estonia's national energy policy, particularly the use of oil shale for energy production, which highlights the importance of the Ida-Virumaa industrial sector. Attention is also being paid to the international context, including the activities of the European Commission and the potential impact of the US presidential elections on climate policy.

Economic perspectives emphasize the low cost of fossil fuels and criticize administrative taxes and emissions trading schemes that artificially inflate energy prices. Opposition is expressed to passing hidden costs (such as maintaining reserve capacity) onto consumers through grid tariffs or tax hikes. Support is given to measures that stimulate economic growth based on affordable energy.

Opposition to "woke ideology" is mentioned, referencing the Reform Party's possible revision of its views on this issue. Other social issues are not addressed.

The legislative focus is on criticizing and challenging the government's recovery and resilience plan and its energy policy (the use of oil shale). The speakers primarily act as opponents and shapers of government policy, demanding a revision of existing positions. The goal is to reduce the impact of administrative taxes and emissions trading.