By Plenary Sessions: Kadri Tali

The style is highly formal and procedural, characteristic of a commission rapporteur conveying the substance and decisions of a meeting. The tone is neutral and objective, focusing on facts, voting results, and arguments presented during the course of the discussion. Emotional appeals are not utilized; the emphasis remains strictly on legislative accuracy.

The style of discourse is formal and procedural, as this is a report of a committee meeting to the plenary session, focusing on facts and voting results. The debate itself utilized both political arguments (Poolamets linked the draft bill to cuts in child benefits) and calls for consensus and a long-term solution (H.M. Helme, Lukas).