By Years: Margit Sutrop

The style is predominantly formal, detailed, and logical, particularly when introducing draft legislation and reporting on the committee's work. However, in speeches concerning patient autonomy, the tone is passionate and value-based, emphasizing human dignity and respect for ethical principles. Cautionary examples are provided regarding the dangers of political interference (USA, EKREIKE) in the autonomy of science.

The style is formal, detailed, and analytical, especially when acting as the rapporteur for the Culture Committee, where he provides comprehensive overviews of the procedural progress. He heavily relies on logical and data-driven arguments, but also incorporates emotional and historical references (e.g., Forselius, Hando Runnel). The tone is optimistic and supportive regarding reforms ("Strength to the Minister of Education!"), but becomes sharp when criticizing opposition proposals as arbitrary or unnecessary.