By Plenary Sessions: Margit Sutrop

The style is formal, serious, and highly persuasive, centering on ethical and logical arguments while emphasizing the importance of dignified death and the prevention of suffering. The speaker highlights the meticulous preparation of the draft legislation and the involvement of experts, utilizing a strictly analytical approach. Furthermore, the speaker addresses the listeners directly and requests an extension of time for the vote, a move that clearly signals passionate commitment to the cause.

The rhetorical style is highly formal, detailed, and procedural, perfectly suited to the role of the rapporteur for the steering committee. The speaker relies on logical arguments, thoroughly explaining the substance of the draft legislation, the scope of inclusion, and the necessary compromises, while refraining from overly emotional language. They frequently employ enumerated lists (firstly, secondly, thirdly) to structure their arguments.

The style is formal and analytical, with the question being posed directly to the rapporteur during the plenary session. The tone is concerned yet constructive, employing a logical appeal to propose a comparative solution (a residency program) for addressing the systemic issue.