By Plenary Sessions: Kalev Stoicescu

Not enough data.

The speaker does not directly criticize any opposing side or group. He mentions the amendment proposal submitted by the parliamentary group of the Social Democratic Party, but treats it neutrally as part of the legislative process.

The opposition is aimed at an unnamed political party, which is being criticized sharply and directly for claiming to give its best effort while failing to strengthen Estonia's national defense. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, expressing deep regret over the actions of the opposing side.

The main external adversary is Russia, which is described as an aggressor and a predator waging psychological warfare against Estonia. Internally, sharp criticism is directed at deficiencies found within the administrative domain of the Ministry of Defence concerning adherence to accounting rules, demanding the immediate rectification of these shortcomings and comprehensive explanations for taxpayers.

The criticism is aimed at the consequences of the previous 2017 amendment to the law, which resulted in unequal treatment for residents of islands with fewer than five inhabitants. No direct political opponent or group is mentioned or attacked; instead, the focus is on the necessity of improving the law.