By Plenary Sessions: Kalev Stoicescu
Total Sessions: 5
Fully Profiled: 5
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The rhetorical style is extremely formal, neutral, and procedural, making it suitable for the rapporteur of the steering committee. The presentation is logical and fact-based, focusing on the precise conveyance of dates, officials, and decisions, devoid of emotional or personal appeals. Extensive use is made of acronyms and official designations, which underscores the technical nature of the subject matter.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The style is formal, procedural, and highly detailed, typical of a leading committee's report presented before the Riigikogu. Although the presentation is predominantly logical and fact-based, the tone shifts to urgent and persuasive when responding to questions, underscoring the necessity of swift action within the context of national defense.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The style is formal, serious, and extremely pressing, emphasizing the "urgency" of taking the necessary steps. Both logical arguments (the effective pooling of resources) and emotional references to the merciless barbarism of the eastern neighbor in Ukraine are employed to underscore the necessity of the legislation. The speaker also utilizes literary comparisons (Tolstoy's "War and Peace") and folk wisdom ("better safe than sorry").
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The speech is serious in tone, authoritative, and urgent, especially when addressing issues of security and responsibility. The style is formal and structured, utilizing numbered points (Firstly, Secondly, etc.) and balancing logical arguments with emotional appeals for unity. The politician warns against psychological warfare and calls for people to be vigilant yet calm, avoiding the spread of war panic.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The style is formal and factual, beginning with the address, "Respected Chair of the Session! Dear Colleagues!" It utilizes both logical arguments (avoiding unequal treatment, ensuring decision-making capacity) and strong emotional and historical appeals, referring to the islands as the pearls of Estonian nature and culture. The tone is corrective and emphasizes national responsibility.