By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

The rhetorical style is highly combative and accusatory, especially towards the distrusted individual who is referred to as the "Savisaar faction." Strong emotional appeals are employed, referencing public sentiment and the negative significance of the memorial ("the hands of the rapists"). The style is also procedural, criticizing the actions of the Deputy Speaker of the Riigikogu and demanding answers to repeated questions.

The rhetorical style is combative and critical, repeatedly contrasting the Reform Party's slogan of "security" with the actual "insecurity." The speaker relies on emotional appeals, quoting pensioners and interest groups, and accuses the government of incompetent management, haste, and recklessness. Logical argumentation is also employed, demanding specific examples of how taxpayer money is being used.

The rhetorical style is sharply critical and aggressive, accusing the government of sowing uncertainty and exhibiting hostility towards children. Strong emotional appeals are employed (e.g., undermining the sense of security, causing exhaustion) alongside specific references to previous promises and interviews (the ERR interview). The tone is formal, yet confrontational in substance.

The rhetorical style is critical and confrontational, raising pointed questions regarding the coalition's actions and motives. Both emotional appeals (such as faith in the state and the will to defend) and logical argumentation are utilized, focusing on the analysis of administrative burden and costs. The speech is formal and directly addresses the leadership of the Riigikogu and the rapporteur.