By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

Information is scarce. While the desire of a history museum official to receive 200,000 euros annually from the state is mentioned, this reference is contextual and is used purely as a political argument.

The entity strongly opposes tax hikes (motor vehicle tax, income tax, VAT), arguing that they will exacerbate poverty and insecurity. It advocates for balancing the state budget through wise expenditure decisions, structural reforms, and innovative economic growth, rather than by increasing the tax burden. Furthermore, it criticizes the vague financing of government commitments via the motor vehicle tax.

Economic views are strongly opposed to tax increases, demanding an end to the relentless cycle of tax hikes and criticizing the draining of families and businesses. The necessity for stability and confidence in the economic environment is emphasized, pointing out that tax increases do exactly the opposite of fostering confidence.

Economic analysts are critical of the new taxation (motor vehicle tax), arguing that it negatively impacts socially vulnerable groups. Fiscal efficiency is emphasized, raising doubts about the costliness of developing and administering new targeted support measures. There are fears that the administrative costs could outweigh the benefits gained from abolishing tax exemptions.