By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

The primary target is the Chairwoman of the Finance Committee (a former Minister of Finance), who faces criticism regarding both her political decisions and her personal integrity. The criticism centers on contradictory promises made about state finances prior to the election, as well as the distortion of the tax reform's actual impact. The intensity of the attack is high, directly accusing the opponent of "outright lying" and "deception."

The primary adversary is the Reform Party, which is accused of brazenly lying about the state of the nation's finances and impending tax hikes prior to the election. The criticism is intense, targeting both specific policies (the tax 'hump,' reduction of family benefits) and specific individuals (Annely Akkermann), who are accused of disseminating false information. The opposition is absolute, with the government's actions being likened to a wicked fairy tale character who causes harm to children.

There is no direct confrontation, but criticism is aimed at the procedure and motives for initiating the draft bill, suspecting that it may be the result of lobbying, rather than a genuine government need. There is opposition to opacity and hidden influences in the legislative process.

The main opponent is the government and the Reform Party, who are being sharply criticized for cuts to the national defense budget and for economic policy decisions (the decline in GDP). The criticism is political and ethics-based, accusing the prime minister of lying and ignoring the military advice provided by the Commander of the Defence Forces. The government is being required to provide a one hundred percent guarantee that the national defense capability will not worsen.

The opponents are being criticized for attempting to frame a statement supporting democracy as interference or lecturing in the affairs of another country. The criticism is aimed at the opposing side's rhetorical framework, which, for the speaker acting as an envoy, raises questions, concerns, and causes embarrassment.

The main confrontation is directed at the government and the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, whose proposals (the immigration quota) and actions (the economic plan) are being criticized. The criticism is aimed both at the political solutions and the lack of internal cooperation within the government, referencing the Prime Minister's statements.