By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The rhetorical style is analytical and incisive, focusing on logical arguments and the raising of procedural questions directed at the minister. The tone is formal and critical, expressing skepticism regarding the government's justifications, particularly concerning the coverage of procedural costs and the speed of the legislative process. Direct rhetorical questions are employed to substantiate the choices made.

The style is formal and direct, addressing esteemed officials (the Chairman of the Riigikogu, the President). A logical, question-based approach is employed, demanding specific answers concerning the conduct and voting record of the Governor of the Bank of Estonia within the ECB Governing Council.

The rhetorical style is formal, yet personal and conciliatory, emphasizing previous successful cooperation with the minister on substantive issues. It utilizes both formal address and slightly colloquial expressions (e.g., "it's in with milk") to describe the project's solid status.

The style is formal and respectful, while simultaneously incorporating personal touches (an apology for not paying attention to the rector's presentation) and light humor regarding rural life. The tone is one of concern, highlighting systemic issues, particularly within the context of national defense and food security. The speaker employs logical arguments to stress the significance of broader value perceptions and attitudes, beyond mere political details.

The speaker employs an inquisitive, critical, and detail-oriented rhetorical style, repeatedly directing pointed questions at the presenters and ministers. The tone remains formal and logical, relying heavily on legal analysis and procedural considerations. The speaker uses cautionary examples (such as oligarchs released from sanctions) to emphasize the risks inherent in passivity.

The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, addressing the Speaker of the Riigikogu and the "ruler" directly. The tone is conceptual and concerned, focusing on the logical framing of the question regarding the necessity of societal ideals.