By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

Economic viewpoints express skepticism regarding the use of fines to cover procedural costs, emphasizing that the public sector and the bodies issuing the fines are maintained at the taxpayer's expense. This highlights concerns about fiscal clarity and the taxpayer's understanding of legal cost structures.

Economic perspectives emphasize the importance of price stability. Doubts are being raised about the effectiveness of a tight monetary policy (maintaining high interest rates) if it fails to curb inflation in Estonia.

Economic considerations address the long-term sustainability and viability of financing state investments (cultural objects). The core question is whether separate funding for large-scale projects will be fiscally sensible in the future.

Economic views support prioritizing local food producers in public procurement, moving away from the lowest-price (competitive bidding) principle. The objective is to guarantee national food security and bolster the local economy, even if it requires foregoing purely price-driven competition. He/She stresses the necessity of self-sufficiency in food production.

There is not enough data.

There is no data available on economic views, tax policy, or budgetary discipline.