By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

Strong interest is expressed in international trade and specific business sectors related to bilateral relations. These positions point to a focus on practical economic activity and a substantive understanding of trade relationships.

We support the use of tax policy (specifically, lowering the VAT rate) as a means to foster economic growth. The primary emphasis is placed on enhancing the competitiveness and export capabilities of the food industry.

Economic positions are expressed in the defense of property rights, standing in opposition to state restrictions (neo-nationalization) which impose obligations (land tax) on the landowner without providing the opportunity to use the land. This points to a resistance against state intervention that diminishes the value of property without compensation.

Economic perspectives address the regulation of services and labor requirements within public transportation, which is defined as a public service. The preference is for stricter regulations (transparency, language proficiency), prioritizing consumer and societal standards over the interests of service providers seeking deregulation.

Prefers fiscal discipline and budget transparency, expressing skepticism toward taking on additional loans and changing budgetary rules to fulfill election promises. They criticize the practice of holding projected costs in reserve, which suggests a desire to show a better budget position or deficit than the actual situation.

Economic perspectives emphasize fiscal discipline and efficiency in spending, challenging subsidies that lack a clear economic rationale (such as the Tartu–Riga train line). Clarity is demanded regarding the state's long-term commitments, including compensation for the losses incurred by Eesti Raudtee (Estonian Railways) and the implementation of baseline funding for public transport.

Insufficient data.