By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The rhetorical style is analytical, formal, and interrogative, focusing on logical and procedural arguments. The speaker expresses concern about engaging in potential "game-playing," which suggests doubt regarding the government's sincerity or its capacity to honor agreements. The tone is rather cautionary and demanding, emphasizing the parliament's responsibility.

The style is formal, critical, and analytical, employing a rhetorical question to assert the speaker's position before the Auditor General. The speaker utilizes a piece of folk wisdom ("the tighter the sieve, the more holes") to illustrate the negative ramifications of the legal amendment. The tone is logical and focuses on highlighting practical issues.

The rhetorical style is sharply accusatory and combative, emphasizing the government's dishonesty and breach of promises ("they lied"). The speaker employs strong moral appeals and demands honesty, criticizing the coalition negotiations as cynical "quid pro quo" trading ("sausage for a sausage") on a security issue.

The style of address is formal and inquisitive, respectfully addressing the presenter ("Honored Presenter"). The speaker employs logical argumentation to test the scope and consistency of the proposal presented, maintaining an analytical and non-confrontational tone.