By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

Criticism is aimed at the potential lack of support from the coalition and the procedural risks involved in the Minister of Education's negotiations. Concerns are being raised that the agreements might not be signed if funding cannot be secured within the coalition, pointing to the danger of "gambling." The criticism targets the uncertainty and procedural lack of transparency surrounding the government's actions.

The objection is aimed at the Riigikogu decision concerning an amendment to legislation, criticizing it on the grounds of unreasonableness, legal problems, and a decline in effectiveness. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, centering on the fact that the decision creates more issues and questions.

The primary opponent is the government coalition, which stands accused of lying and adopting decisions that run counter to the interests of the Estonian state. The criticism is intense, focusing both on the failed tax policy and the political horse-trading of security issues. The speaker criticizes the government for deliberate stalling and for writing unfeasible declarations into the coalition agreement.

The confrontation is aimed at the Reform Party, indirectly criticizing the scope and consistency of their procedural decisions. The criticism is politically calculated, questioning whether the party’s "leniency" extends to other factions, and not just to the non-aligned MP.