By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The primary criticism is directed at the waste management policy of the minister and the government, which is considered ineffective and more detrimental to the environment than the alternatives. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, calling into question the government's understanding of local government administration, which critics describe as "very rosy."

The criticism is aimed at the coalition (the Reform Party and the Social Democrats), who stand accused of hypocrisy (citing the Viljandi example) and obstructing the opposition’s work by interpreting the Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act in a manner that prevents voting on the opposition’s proposed amendments. He/She warns that this interpretation strips the opposition of the ability to alter the content or objective of the draft law.

The speaker is critical of both earlier parliaments (dating back to 2004) and the current government, faulting them for a lack of political will and foresight regarding national defense. Turning to the context of party financing, he sharply criticizes the structure and operation of the ERJK, accusing it of systemic chaos and unfairly targeting specific individuals.

The criticism is aimed at the activities of the Ministry of Finance and the Minister of Finance, focusing on the inaccuracy of budget procedures and expenditure planning. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, questioning the accuracy of the planning and the justification for reallocating funds.