By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The main opponents are the Riigikogu Board and the leading committee (the Constitutional Committee), who are primarily criticized for procedural violations (the bundling of amendments) and for choosing a path of lawbreaking. The criticism is intense, accusing the Board of violating the fundamental rights of Riigikogu members and of the "malicious and criminal" use of a Supreme Court decision to limit obstruction. No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, the immediate cessation of the illegal activity is demanded.

The opposition's stance is highly intense, directed against the Minister of Social Protection and the government, accusing them of deliberately pitting families against one another. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure, faulting them for making decisions before the analysis was completed and for revoking previous promises. The speaker labels the government's actions irresponsible and a great disservice to the future of Estonia.

The primary opponents are the Reform Party and the government coalition, who are accused of neglecting security and voting down the Isamaa bill. The criticism is both political and procedural. The Minister of the Interior is criticized personally, being labeled an additional security threat due to his/her arbitrary interpretation.

The primary adversaries are the ruling coalition, particularly the Social Democrats (Läänemets and Ossinovski), who face criticism for the ideological inconsistency of their economic policy. The critique is intense, focusing both on procedural injustice (the disregard for prior agreements) and the political substance (tax hikes), thereby precluding any compromise regarding procedural rules.