By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

Insufficient data

Supports strong state intervention and investment in family policy, even if financed by loans, viewing this as the only way to secure future taxpayers. It opposes the government's tax policy (the abolition of income tax exemptions, the car tax), which diminishes the economic security of families. Investing in children is considered a sustainable activity, not living at the expense of the future.

His/Her economic views are strongly opposed to tax hikes, criticizing the government's aggressive push to implement several tax packages (including car, sugar, and excise taxes) in a short timeframe. He/She accuses the government of prioritizing the implementation of taxes over security concerns.

Economic views are critical of the coalition's tax policy, especially concerning the high cost of raising indirect taxes and abolishing the tax hump, which runs contrary to the ideology of the Social Democrats. The speaker defends their party (Isamaa) against accusations that the proposed benefits are unfunded and demands that the government detail alternative choices and cost-saving measures (e.g., criticizing the size of the Foreign Minister’s entourage).