By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The speaker points to other colleagues in the chamber who share similar suspicions about the motives behind Mart Võrklaev’s appointment, implying an indirect collaboration in formulating opposition positions. Direct communication, however, tends to be confrontational and demanding.

The speaker points out Isamaa’s previous participation in the coalition, which demonstrates a readiness for cooperation. However, he highlights frustration with the current collaboration because the Social Democrats failed to support Isamaa’s proposal to regulate the price of the universal service. This suggests a limited openness to compromise on crucial policy matters.

There is not enough data.

The party offers the government assistance in tax reduction ("We will contribute"), though this offer is framed from an opposition standpoint, suggesting the government needs to rectify its policies. There is no direct indication of a willingness to compromise with the government; instead, the focus remains on the necessity of correcting the government's errors.

The speeches focus on criticism and demands for adherence to parliamentary procedure, as well as opposition to the government's policies. There is no evidence of a willingness to cooperate or of seeking compromises with other factions.