By Agendas: Maido Ruusmann

The style is formal and analytical, beginning with praise for the minister's report but quickly transitioning to a critical issue. A logical appeal is employed, relying on statistical comparisons and geopolitical arguments. The tone is concerned and emphasizes the seriousness of the situation ("a truly dire picture").

The rhetorical style is analytical and inquisitive, aimed at verifying the previous speaker's knowledge and highlighting political facts. The tone is formal and relies on logical arguments and the specifics of the coalition agreement, while avoiding emotional appeals.

The rhetorical style is polite and direct, presenting the question for clarification within the formal environment of the parliament. The speaker focuses on a logical, yet simple answer (beneficial or detrimental), avoiding emotional or narrative appeals.

The style is formal, optimistic, and supportive, praising the minister's presentation as "promising." Logical arguments are employed (economic and security considerations) alongside metaphors, describing infrastructure as the nation's "lifeblood." The speaker formally addresses the Chairman of the Riigikogu and colleagues, and requests additional time.

The address is formal and respectful, directed toward the Prime Minister and including a compliment ("as a very intelligent person"). The style is inquisitive and concerned, highlighting the necessity of swift and concrete solutions for mitigating regional issues.

The style is formal and respectful (involving thanks and addressing the minister), but simultaneously concerned and urgent, emphasizing the seriousness of the problem ("my concern is serious"). It employs both personal involvement (being sent from Southeast Estonia) and logical argumentation (referencing the security risk and the ineffectiveness of the measures). The address concludes with the raising of specific political questions.

The rhetorical style is polite and respectful, beginning with an acknowledgment of a positive message directed to the President of the Bank of Estonia. The tone is formal and focuses on analytical, policy-driven questions, calling for data-based recommendations for the government. A logical appeal is utilized, linking the personal regional background with the political concern.

The language used is formal, polite, and interrogative, addressing the Speaker of the Riigikogu and the rapporteur respectfully. The style is predominantly logical and analytical, utilizing questions both to cast doubt on the motives of the opposing side and to clarify the substance of the law.

The style is formal and analytical, starting with a fact-based diagnosis of regional inequality. The speaker poses a direct and demanding question to the minister, seeking comprehensive solutions, which suggests reliance on logical rather than emotional persuasion.