By Plenary Sessions: Signe Riisalo

The rhetorical style is formal and questioning, addressing the minister politely and presenting the concern directly. The speaker employs a logical appeal, seeking answers and a clear vision for the future direction of the policy.

The style is authoritative, explanatory, and at times defensive, especially when responding to opponents who are accused of presenting half-truths and failing to delve into the proposed legislation. The speaker relies heavily on logical arguments and data to justify the policy. He balances the technical explanation with an emphasis on social concern, noting that the social sphere reflects the development level of society.

The speaker's rhetorical style is formal, procedural, and highly detailed, focusing on the presentation of facts, a detailed explanation of the draft bill's content, and a description of the committee's work process. The tone is predominantly logical and matter-of-fact, but becomes defensive when responding to criticism, which is labeled as "half-truths." Data and references to legislation are used instead of emotional appeals.