Agenda Profile: Marek Reinaas

The political position is one of strong support for the amendments to the Competition Act (609 SE), which are framed as protecting the principles of a free market economy and the rule of law. The speaker emphasizes that the law aligns with the liberal and right-wing worldview of Eesti 200, where the priority is the rapid restoration of functioning competition, rather than punitive measures. This stance is strongly value-based, stressing the need to prevent the arbitrary use of power by officials when imposing administrative penalties. The importance of making a decision is also highlighted in order to stop the daily fine currently accruing against the Estonian state.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in competition law, the transposition of the European Union directive, and procedural law (misdemeanor proceedings versus administrative proceedings). He refers to his role as the head of the commission and the lead processor of the draft bill, providing detailed explanations regarding the involvement of the Competition Authority and the adoption of amendments. The speed of processing the draft bill (six months) is contrasted with the previous delay (six years), demonstrating procedural authority.

The rhetorical style is confident, well-argued, and at times combative, especially when refuting opponents' accusations and labeling them "absurd." The appeals are primarily logical and ideological, stressing the principles of a free market economy and the rule of law. Specific figures are used (a 3,000 euro fine per day, over 30 amendments), and the urgency of the decision-making process is emphasized.

The speaker is an active legislator, serving as the lead handler of the draft bill and the chair of the committee. He/She refers to a specific working meeting with the Competition Authority, which demonstrates intensive work and deep engagement in the preparation of the legislation.

Opposition is being mounted against those who filed a motion of no confidence against Minister Liisa Pakosta, categorically refuting the accusations of delaying the adoption of the law and weakening the Competition Authority. Criticism is also aimed at those who prioritize punishment determined by officials over the rapid restoration of the market situation, thereby calling into question their ideological priority.

The style of cooperation is inclusive, particularly concerning state agencies, emphasizing close collaboration with the Competition Authority. It is noted that a separate working meeting was held with the Competition Authority, and over 30 amendments derived from their proposals were adopted, demonstrating a readiness for substantive cooperation.

The focus is on the national level, addressing the transposition of the European Union directive and its impact on the competitive environment of the Republic of Estonia. There is no regional focus.

The economic views are strongly market-based and liberal, emphasizing the importance of competition in securing the best prices for consumers and creating a level playing field for both small and large enterprises. We oppose market distortions and support regulation that provides the Competition Authority with the necessary tools for the swift restoration of competition, prioritizing this approach over punitive measures.

Insufficient data

The legislative focus is on adopting the draft amendment to the Competition Act (Bill 609 SE) in order to stop the daily fine resulting from the failure to transpose the directive and to provide the Competition Authority with the necessary tools. An important goal is to ensure that administrative penalties are imposed under misdemeanor proceedings, while upholding the principles of the rule of law and protecting undertakings against malicious accusations.