By Plenary Sessions: Valdo Randpere

The style is analytical and critical, especially regarding the opponents' proposals, which are referred to as "an empty document" and "ideological self-promotion." The speaker uses logical arguments and references to the commission's work, but also includes ironic and colloquial expressions (e.g., "nanny," "fools must indeed be separated from their money") to emphasize their stance. The tone is formal, as the commission's views are being represented, but it also contains sharp personal judgments.

The speaking style is direct, procedural, and slightly humorous, including a remark intended to engage the audience (a request not to leave the hall). The emphasis is on logical appeal, stressing the quality and consensus of the draft bill to justify a swift final vote.