By Months: Valdo Randpere

Total Months: 9

Fully Profiled: 9

11.2025

9 Speeches

The speaker demonstrates authority regarding the procedures and processes of the Legal Affairs Committee, referencing minutes and previous discussions. He/She is familiar with the details of prison administration, including security matters at Tartu Prison and the risk of decay associated with vacant buildings (Jõhvi Prison). This knowledge is based on answers provided by experts (Deputy Secretary General Rait Kuuse) who participated in the committee sessions.
10.2025

4 Speeches

The expertise is evident concerning regional economics and economic concentration, utilizing the specific term GDP (Gross Domestic Product). The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the regional distribution of production and economic activity and its subsequent impact on the nation.
09.2025

2 Speeches

The speaker demonstrates specific knowledge of the financial mechanisms and legislation of the Bank of Estonia, referencing Section 30 of the Bank of Estonia Act. The expertise covers the profit distribution procedure, distinguishing between reserve capital, the increase of equity capital, and the freely distributable portion. Furthermore, they utilize historical knowledge concerning previous profit transfers to the state budget (e.g., 2020).
06.2025

14 Speeches

The speaker demonstrates authority regarding the work and procedural processes of the Legal Committee, representing the committee's positions on the topics of aviation security and fraud. They utilize detailed information concerning the committee's deliberations, participating institutions (the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs, the Prosecutor's Office), and the analysis of fraud. Furthermore, they possess knowledge of international legal examples, referencing the punishability of fraud in Great Britain and the activities of Lithuanian fraudsters.
05.2025

4 Speeches

The speaker demonstrates authority and technical competence in international aviation law and conventions, detailing how the mechanism for prosecution is changing in Estonia. He/She was appointed as the representative of the steering committee precisely on the basis of this competence, being able to clarify complex legal aspects (e.g., why an act committed in flight differs from being denied boarding).
04.2025

5 Speeches

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the history of strategic management (Estonia 2035) and labor law legislation (specifically, the Collective Agreement Act 2012). They present detailed explanations concerning the rationale and consequences of legislative amendments, employing technical terminology such as "strategic management tool" and referencing the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of contract. Furthermore, they possess specific knowledge regarding the effects of reducing VAT on foodstuffs in other European countries (Sweden).
03.2025

5 Speeches

The speaker demonstrates a strong grasp of the jurisdiction and operational procedures (Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act) of the parliament's special committees, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to the mandate. Furthermore, they possess detailed knowledge of recent history, citing precise dates and government compositions (Kaja Kallas's resignation and the formation of the new government in the summer of 2022).
02.2025

4 Speeches

The speaker demonstrates a thorough knowledge of criminal law and procedural economy, citing the recommendations of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and specific sections of the Constitution (§ 22 and § 24). Furthermore, he demonstrates specific knowledge of international agreements, citing as an example the Estonia Wreck Peace Agreement and the clauses governing its incorporation into national legislation.
01.2025

2 Speeches

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the financing and timelines of the specific hospital project, emphasizing procedural deficiencies. The argument is supported by referencing a specific date (July 7, 2022) and using a direct quote from a political opponent (Mihhail Kõlvart) to justify a previous decision.