By Plenary Sessions: Mati Raidma

The language used is formal, supportive, and persuasive, while simultaneously emphasizing the time-criticality and urgency of the topic. The appeal is primarily logical and procedural, focusing on establishing legal clarity and solidifying roles. Inclusive rhetoric is employed, stressing that ensuring crisis resilience is a role for the Riigikogu (Parliament), the public sector, and every member of society.

The style is formal and respectful, including thanks for the presentation and addressing the "esteemed chairman." At the same time, the tone is questioning and demanding due to the necessity of quickly clarifying the draft law before the October 10 deadline. The emphasis is on logical and procedural argumentation, rather than emotional appeals.

The style is formal, comprehensive, and procedural, fitting for a rapporteur of the steering committee. Logical appeals are employed, and there is an emphasis on systematicity and clarity, achieved by reiterating key points ("repetition is the mother of wisdom"). The tone is businesslike and persuasive, highlighting the time-sensitive nature of the draft legislation and urging colleagues to contribute.

The rhetorical style is formal, professional, and institutional, beginning with a polite expression of thanks to the Minister for their presentation. The tone is quite demanding and urgent, stressing the need for strategic innovations and eagerly anticipating the debates.