By Agendas: Juku-Kalle Raid

The analysis focuses on matters concerning the procedural rules of the Riigikogu and the conduct of its sessions, particularly regarding the right to reply following a personal mention or insult. The speaker employs precise procedural language ("procedurally," "to take the floor for a reply").

No data available. The speech is extremely brief and focuses more on expressing support and the rhetorical framework, rather than technical or legal details.

The speaker demonstrates thorough knowledge of the history and institutional background of the Orthodox Church in Estonia, referencing the restoration of the EAÕK in 1996 and its dissolution in the 1940s. This expertise is confirmed by a reference to State Archives documents (a telegram) and personal experience meeting Patriarchs Bartholomew and Kirill as a journalist. The topic is addressed from the perspective of historical continuity and security guarantees.

The speaker demonstrates authority in their knowledge of Estonian literature and history, referencing Juhan Viiding’s poem, its 1985 context, and the Juhan Liiv poetry award. Additionally, they possess specific knowledge concerning Christmas-themed undertakings in Põlva County and their logistics.

The expertise is related to the context of amendments to the Accounting Act, employing terms such as "thresholds" and "the percentage question." The knowledge is directed toward the mechanisms for political negotiations and the confirmation of agreements (for the sake of the transcript). Deep technical or statistical expertise is not demonstrated in the address.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the Riigikogu’s internal procedural rules and the working procedures of the Foreign Affairs Committee. He/She uses precise technical terminology when describing the dates a bill was taken into proceedings, the designation of the lead committee, and the voting requirements ("an absolute majority of the votes of the composition of the Riigikogu").

The speaker demonstrates expertise at the intersection of the Electoral Law and the Penal Code, emphasizing the connection between the age of full responsibility (currently 18) and the voting age. The focus is on legal consistency and the principle of accountability, referencing the need to amend the criminal law.

The expertise is demonstrated by quoting the title of the agenda item verbatim and explaining its precise content, while distinguishing between the institution and the adherents. This indicates knowledge of the exact wording of the legislative text and of procedural correctness. Awareness is also demonstrated regarding the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and their previous violations.

The speaker acknowledges the addressee's interest in the fuel topic but shifts focus to personal observations regarding the presence of smoking and smokers within the parliament building. No technical or data-based expertise is presented; instead, the discussion relies solely on shared personal experiences.

The speaker demonstrates comprehensive knowledge regarding the monument's history, its original purpose (1947), and related past events, such as the relocation of the Narva tank. Historical facts and personal anecdotes (Aili Jõgi's actions in 1946, a personal incident in 1986) are employed to bolster their viewpoint. Specific locations, namely the Maarjamäe Museum and the park of monuments, are cited as the preferred solution, illustrating an awareness of the established practice for exhibiting Soviet heritage.