Henn Põlluaas

Henn Põlluaas (Isamaa) was the most active speaker, utilizing extended time and presenting strong opposition to the draft bill on behalf of his faction, stressing the defense of national security and sovereignty. (Position: right-wing)

The most active speaker at the moment was BDH3H-JWux0 (Henn Põlluaas), who represents the Isamaa faction and who gave two longer and more emotional commentaries, along with a thorough discussion of the content of the draft. He belongs to the right-wing political group (Isamaa). His activity can be considered significant, and his actions highlighted the importance of the security issues and the state's sovereignty topic group in the context of the draft.

The most active representative was BDH3H-JWux0, who represented the Isamaa faction and delivered several thorough and lengthy speeches. Positionally, he aligns with the right-wing (legal-political) direction.

Henn Põlluaas (better) was very active, criticizing the interior minister’s responses as "embarrassing evasion" and accusing the government of acting on historical memory in a way that is rooted in a Russian Putinist narrative. He also received extra time.

The most active speaker was Member of the Riigikogu and representative of the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta (minister) – position: other.

The most active speaker: BDH3H-JWux0 (Henn Põlluaas, EKRE). Position: right (right-wing); that is, a recipient distinct from the main factions and a strong catalyst in discussions.

The most active speaker: Henn Põlluaas (BDH3H-JWux0) – right-wing political position (EKRE). He served as the key presenter during the introduction of the interpellation, the confirmation of the list of its proponents, and remained an active driving force for the agenda item throughout the ensuing debate.

The most active speaker was Henn Põlluaas, who presented a detailed report on behalf of the initiators of Bill 246. Põlluaas (Estonian Conservative People's Party, opposition) explained the historical background of the bill, referencing previous constitutional disputes and the stances taken by the Supreme Court. He focused on arguments that the "two-chair system" violates local government autonomy and the principle of separation of powers, and sharply criticized the phenomenon of "decoy candidates," where politicians use local elections merely to harvest votes, thereby damaging political culture and the independence of local councils.

The most active speaker was the initiator of the bill, Henn Põlluaas, who delivered a presentation and answered numerous questions (totaling 12 interventions). Põlluaas represented the conservative opposition (EKRE) and was a staunch advocate for the bill, emphasizing the necessity of banning the burqa and niqab in the name of protecting women's rights and ensuring security.

The most active speaker was Henn Põlluaas, who presented the draft bill and answered numerous questions (10 times in total). Põlluaas represented the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party (EKRE), which is a right-wing opposition party.