By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets
Total Sessions: 6
Fully Profiled: 6
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal, critical, and focused on logic, avoiding emotional appeals. The speaker raises pointed questions regarding the absence of an impact analysis and adopts a didactic tone toward the presenter, recommending they consult the PPA website. The emphasis is placed on highlighting procedural errors and deficiencies in the drafting of the bill.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, critical, and highly interrogative, using direct questions to challenge the presenter's motives and cast doubt on the coalition's credibility. The tone is skeptical, particularly concerning the centralization of power in the hands of a single party.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style is formal and persuasive, combining logical arguments (EU harmonization, economic benefit) with philosophical and emotional appeals. Emphasis is placed on valuing and ensuring the well-being of employees, referencing Tammsaare and the common deathbed regrets concerning overwork. The tone is generally positive, focusing on the advantages of the draft bill.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and intensely interrogative, presenting the Prime Minister with a series of detailed questions regarding the transparency of procedures and decisions. The tone is demanding and critical, underscoring the necessity for accountability and clarity. The follow-up question is aimed at obtaining precise confirmation of the Prime Minister's previous response.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The style is formal, respectful, and professional, addressing both the presiding officer of the session and the Prime Minister. The rhetoric is purely logical and informative, focusing on a specific political inquiry concerning developments and organizational changes. Emotional or personal appeals are completely absent.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style is confrontational and accusatory, using a specific and scandalous story from a journalistic investigation as the basis for the political attack. The issue raised is direct and intense, aimed at calling into question the moral authority of the minister and the coalition. The rhetoric relies on an emotional and moral appeal.