By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

Economic views are skeptical regarding the large state subsidies (2.6 billion euros), especially when they are based on questionable economic forecasts. The speaker casts doubt on the promise that the support would lead to a significant drop in electricity prices and an economic gain of 5 billion euros.

Expresses concern regarding the economic difficulties faced by farmers and producers due to wolf packs. The question is also raised whether the paid mechanism for processing research ethics cases (up to 3,000 euros) creates unequal accessibility for researchers, which points to the desire to ensure fair financial access to these regulations.

There is not enough data.

The economic perspective is critical of regulations that favor foreign shell companies—entities that neither pay taxes nor create jobs—but nevertheless demand substantial damages. It supports protecting the financial stability of local governments and opposes using public funds (such as those allocated for extracurricular activities or school buildings) to cover the risks of private enterprises or reimburse legal fees.

The economic views expressed are strongly anti-regulation, criticizing both the growth of bureaucracy and the mandatory requirement for large corporations to file sustainability reports. The speaker emphasizes the urgent need to improve the business environment and accuses the government of representing narrow business interests (specifically wind energy). He views the current policy as actively worsening people's livelihoods.