Session Profile: Evelin Poolamets
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
2024-01-16
Political Position
The political position is strongly oppositional toward the bills initiated by the government, particularly regarding the amendment to the Water Act, which is viewed as serving hidden business interests. The speaker takes a firm stand on the issue of social conflict and symbols, demanding the removal of the Bronze Soldier, as it violates the peace of the gravesite and causes incidents that disrupt public order. The government's actions are framed by suspicion and accusations of corruption, with reference made to the "Stark-Logistics government."
6 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in legislative procedures, criticizing the absence of the Drafting Intention (VÕK) and the justification provided for applying European law. He demonstrates knowledge of the specifics of environmental law, distinguishing between the requirements for an environmental permit and a registration procedure concerning water reuse. He links the legal amendments to specific industrial applications, such as the establishment of pulp mills near mining sites.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is skeptical, aggressive, and combative, employing strong accusations and rhetorical questions. Sharp and emotional language is used (e.g., "circus," "hypocritical"), along with references to the "Stark-Logistics Government" to emphasize hidden business interests and the true objective of the bill. The argumentation relies on both procedural deficiencies and logical objections (e.g., transporting water to Viimsi just to water the grass).
6 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The patterns of activity indicate active participation in the plenary session on January 16, repeatedly posing questions to both the rapporteur and the minister. The speaker delivered a lengthy critical address on behalf of the faction regarding the draft Water Act, which culminated in a motion for rejection.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Strong opposition is aimed at the government, which has been dubbed the "Stark-Logistics Government," suggesting corruption and the serving of hidden business interests. The criticism is both procedural (citing the lack of a formal drafting intention) and substantive, accusing the government of fulfilling an "order." The opposition is intense and culminates in a proposal to reject the bill during its first reading.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker is acting as a representative of the Estonian Conservative People's Party parliamentary group, submitting a motion for rejection on behalf of the group. There is no information regarding cooperation or a willingness to compromise with other parties; the focus is on vigorously opposing government initiatives.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The regional focus is tied to national legislation but includes specific references to the Ida-Virumaa quarries as a potential source of reclaimed water for industrial use. The water scarcity situation in Viimsi is also used as an example to illustrate the absurdity of the draft bill's objectives. Furthermore, social tensions in Tallinn related to the Bronze Soldier are discussed.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic perspective raises doubts about the simplification of regulations, since replacing the environmental permit with simple registration reduces the administrative burden while simultaneously creating favorable conditions for major industrial interests. The speaker suspects that the true objective of the legislation is to benefit specific businesses, such as the construction of a pulp mill adjacent to mining operations.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
When addressing social issues, strong emphasis is placed on public order and national symbolism, highlighting the annual incidents associated with the Bronze Soldier. The speaker argues that the jostling and "carousing" of intoxicated individuals on May 9th disturbs the peace of the grave, which should be sufficient grounds for the monument's removal.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is on opposing the draft legislation amending the Water Act, criticizing the procedural deficiencies and hidden objectives inherent in its development process. The speaker is a strong opponent of the bill and, on behalf of the parliamentary group, proposes its rejection during the first reading. The question regarding the possibility of removing the Bronze Soldier was also raised.
6 Speeches Analyzed