By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The rhetorical style is sharply critical, skeptical, and demanding, expressing strong distrust. Direct accusations of superiority and hints of dishonesty are employed ("you are leading us by the nose"). The speaker demands specific explanations regarding the minister's errors, balancing this logical requirement with the theme of lacking emotional trust.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and passionate, employing strong emotional appeals and accusations directed at the government. The speaker accuses the Reform Party of "lying" and of hypocrisy shielded by a "Teflon layer." The style blends political attacks with logical arguments, drawing on both statistics and expert opinions.

The rhetorical style is confrontational, accusatory, and sharp, employing strong contrasts, such as the saying, "some ride in carriages while others hang from the gallows." The speaker poses several direct rhetorical questions to force the prime ministerial candidate to address past ethical and political inconsistencies. Both ethical appeals (the lack of an apology) and political logic (the rebranding of taxes as a national defense tax) are utilized.

The style is formal and critical, starting with a polite address directed at the presenter. The speaker employs a rhetorical question and cites the opposing side's previous positions to emphasize the failure to locate a point of equilibrium, utilizing the metaphor "getting on the horse's back" to describe the economic burden.