By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The political position is clearly opposed to the minister facing a no-confidence vote, centering on their earlier views regarding Crimea and the notion that the Soviet Union ended prematurely. The speaker strongly challenges the minister's trustworthiness and sincerity, asserting that these statements are typical of a Putin propagandist. This is a value-based stance, emphasizing the profound lack of confidence in the minister.

The political stance is strongly opposed to the car tax, stressing its detrimental effects on the economy and vulnerable groups. The core narrative revolves around the government's dishonesty and incompetence, accusing the Reform Party of systematic lying and turning its back on the people in favor of Brussels. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of supporting large families and people with disabilities, rather than imposing new burdens on them.

The speaker is strongly opposed to the prime ministerial candidate, focusing on their past ethical issues (the Reform Party funding scandal) and the instability of their national defense policy (specifically, the desire to abolish compulsory military service). The position is highly critical, stressing the importance of the politician's trustworthiness and integrity, and criticizing the decision to reward the candidate with the premiership despite their past errors. The political framework employed is strongly value-driven and results-oriented, demanding accountability.

The political position is strongly focused on supporting large families through tax policy, particularly concerning the purchase of larger vehicles, aiming to give them "breathing room." The speaker criticizes the government's tax design, questioning whether the promised balance point between environmental objectives and the economic burden on citizens has truly been achieved. This position is value-driven, emphasizing social justice within the context of taxation.