By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

The rhetorical style is skeptical and critical, focusing on contradictions and raising questions about the profitability of wind farms. Logical argumentation (the decline in market prices) is used, blended with emotional appeal (the forceful imposition of these projects upon local communities). The speaker poses pointed questions designed to expose the inherent contradiction built into the scheme.

The rhetorical style is insistent, concerned, and uncompromising, framing e-elections as a security threat requiring immediate elimination. Logical arguments are employed (facts concerning the decline of trust, international practice), but the tone is demanding, questioning whether there is anything left to investigate or if immediate action should be taken.

The rhetorical style is formal and direct, employing salutations such as "Esteemed Chairman" and "Dear Presenter." The tone is interrogative and skeptical, calling into question the existence of positive constructiveness within the governing coalition. The speech relies on a logical and procedural framing of the issue.

The style is sharply critical and confrontational, accusing the opposing side of pursuing one-sided policies and justifying mandates from Brussels. The speaker employs a rhetorical question ("Why don't you look at the slightly wider picture?") and emphasizes a logical appeal, contrasting costly wind investments with more affordable domestic solutions.

The rhetorical style is sharp, accusatory, and based on contrasts, linking social issues to the survival of the nation. Strong emotional appeals are used (large families have been hit the hardest), and the funding of "windmill businessmen" is contrasted with the lack of support for large families.