By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

Total Sessions: 5

Fully Profiled: 5

2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary targets of criticism are wind energy developers, who stand accused of aggressively forcing projects onto communities against the will of local residents, driven by high profit expectations. The criticism focuses on their economic motives and unethical conduct (specifically, resorting to legal action with the aid of lawyers). Furthermore, the green transition itself is criticized as a policy that generates economic instability and energy poverty.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the e-voting system and those who support its continuation, who are accused of ignoring a security threat. The criticism is intense and politically charged, highlighting the system's lack of trustworthiness and also referencing the Märt Põder case.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed against the governing coalition and its members, accusing them of failing to seek solutions and lacking a positive constructive spirit. The criticism is political and procedural, focusing specifically on the coalition's inaction regarding the Value Added Tax (VAT) issue.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is facing intense criticism for neglecting energy security and acting as a special representative for Brussels. The criticism is policy-based, centering on poor investment decisions and a narrow focus on wind turbines. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, a fundamental change in direction is being demanded.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The main criticism is directed at the coalition led by the Reform Party, which is accused of harming large families through the introduction of the car tax and outrageous electricity bills. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, suggesting that the government has set unfair priorities, finding billions for businessmen instead of for families.