By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

The rhetorical style is critical, skeptical, and interrogative, posing direct challenges and doubts to the presenter. Logical arguments concerning stability, security, and cost-effectiveness are employed. The position is underscored by repeated rhetorical questions, such as, "Why is this still being resisted?"

The style is provocative and confrontational, using historical examples to cast doubt on the consistency of opponents. In the sociopolitical discussion, charged and potentially offensive language is employed (e.g., "negroes," "homosexuals") to highlight the extreme nature of the quota system proposed by the opposition. The speaker is prepared to defend their phrasing, denying any intent to demean the presenter.

The rhetorical style is sharply critical and combative, employing negative assessments to describe the government's actions, such as "insane economic policy" and "irrelevant fine-tuning." Political attacks are also utilized (e.g., the Social Democrats' policy U-turn), and a logical appeal is stressed: that the key issues of the economy must be addressed.

The rhetorical style is analytical and challenging, relying on statistical facts and figures when presenting arguments. The tone is directly interrogative toward the government, demanding concrete plans for implementing these models and emphasizing logical appeal.