By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

The confrontation is aimed at the proponents of policies favoring unstable wind energy, who are being criticized for choosing solutions that are both unstable and expensive. The criticism is political and substantive, emphasizing that the opposing side is ignoring viable options for ensuring a permanent and stable electricity supply.

The main criticism is aimed at the Reform Party due to the inconsistency of their Russia policy, often singling out Urmas Paet's previous stances. Furthermore, there is intense criticism directed at the rapporteur who is promoting a systemic equality plan, raising doubts about its potential economic impact. The criticism is political in nature but is being delivered with high intensity.

The confrontation is aimed at the government as a whole and the coalition partners (Eesti 200, Social Democrats). The criticism is intense, focusing on the failure of the government's economic policy and misplaced priorities, accusing them of damaging business. Compromise is ruled out on the immigration issue, where a zero quota is being demanded.

The speaker is clearly in an opposition role, presenting direct questions to "your government" regarding their research and plans. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the government's inability to research and implement successful demographic policies.