By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak
Total Sessions: 4
Fully Profiled: 4
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance expresses strong opposition to the state's plans to build large wind farms in the immediate vicinity of settlements, emphasizing the concerns of local residents and their right to halt the process. The speaker calls into question the state's planning decisions that prioritize placing wind turbines close to residential areas, with the focus being on the efficacy of the policy and the protection of the living environment.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is one of strong opposition to the government's budget and economic policy, which are considered short-sighted and detrimental to the livelihood of the majority of the population. The speaker sharply criticizes the entrenchment of tax increases, the continuation of Rail Baltic, and the economy-damaging climate transition. This position is strongly results-oriented, emphasizing that most people are currently facing significantly greater hardship than they were before.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political platform is vehemently opposed to the government's tax increases (the so-called security tax), labeling it a scam and an act of revenge by the Reform Party. The primary focus is on the failure of the government's economic policy and the way it is taxing the population into poverty, demanding the formation of a national and pro-people government. The overall stance is highly confrontational and rests on the government's poor economic performance.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is currently on amendments to the Child Protection Act, particularly regarding employment restrictions for individuals convicted of sexual offenses against children. The speaker is strongly opposed to the draft legislation that replaces the word "ban" with the word "restriction," arguing that this change would allow pedophiles to return to institutions dealing with children. This stance is clearly value-based and centered on child safety, and it accuses the Reform Party of initiating a dangerous process.