By Plenary Sessions: Õnne Pillak

The political stance involves strong support for the state budget, which has been dubbed the "Budget of Security and Prosperity." Key priorities include historically large investments in national defense while simultaneously reducing the tax burden and increasing incomes. The budget deficit is justified as the price of freedom, highlighting the courage required to make these necessary decisions. This position is strongly rooted in policy and core values (freedom, security).

The political position strongly supports the continuation of the Rail Baltic project, emphasizing its planned completion by 2030. This support is motivated by potential economic benefits, enhanced European connectivity, and the critical security dimension (military logistics). The speaker issued a strong warning regarding the consequences of withdrawing from the project, which would entail exiting all international agreements, including a potential departure from the European Union.

The political focus is heavily centered on economic revitalization and improving people's welfare. Emphasis is being placed on the need for state measures that would provide a stronger boost to economic growth. This is a results-oriented approach that underscores the state's crucial role in guaranteeing economic success.

The political focus is strongly directed toward national defense and the people's will to defend, which is considered exemplary and high in Estonia. The position is value-based and policy-focused, emphasizing the importance of the cooperation and contribution of the Defense League (Kaitseliit) and the Women's Home Defense (Naiskodukaitse) in enhancing the country's defense capability. The speaker acknowledges existing achievements but simultaneously calls for an evaluation of the activities of these organizations.

The political position is predominantly procedural, focusing on defending the Riigikogu agenda and strongly opposing the majority of amendments. The only clear substantive stance concerns the transfer of the management of the state's healthcare reserves from the Health Board (Terviseamet) to regional hospitals. These positions are presented as strong factional opposition, emphasizing the preservation of the existing order.