By Plenary Sessions: Õnne Pillak

Opponents are criticized for being overly emotional and misinterpreting facts, especially concerning how economic forecasts are covered in the media. The speaker condemns the "painting of a bleak picture" and calls for substantive discussions rather than those that play on emotions.

The confrontation is directed against the Centre Faction, confirming their lack of support for the construction of Rail Baltic. It criticizes the opposing side for seeking reasons why the project cannot be carried out and rejects their claims regarding the insignificance of the security dimension. The opposition is sharp both politically and substantively, but it is not personal.

Insufficient data

None. The discourse contains neither criticism nor conflicting viewpoints, but is aimed at constructive dialogue and gathering information.

The opposition is primarily aimed at the procedural motions of other factions (e.g., the Centre Party faction) and individual members (Urmas Reinsalu, Helle-Moonika Helme). The criticism remains consistently procedural, focusing on preventing changes to the agenda. The opposition is strong and uncompromising towards most of the proposed amendments.