By Plenary Sessions: Heljo Pikhof

Strong opposition is directed towards the initiators of the constitutional amendment bill, criticizing both their creation of a value-based dividing line and procedural deficiencies (the absence of an impact analysis). In the education sector, the Ministry of Education and Research (HTM) and the government face criticism for their inadequate analysis of the burden placed on, and the financing provided to, local municipalities. Furthermore, concerns were raised regarding the Chancellor of Justice’s appeal concerning the conditions for expulsion from upper secondary school (gymnasium).

The main opposition is directed at the individual who expressed a viewpoint blaming women regarding pregnancy and abortion. The criticism is intense and personal, calling into question the opponent's moral right to make decisions for women. The opponent's positions are criticized as unfair and unrealistic, particularly considering the necessity of raising children with care and love.