By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

It does not express outright hostility, but critically questions the adequacy and effectiveness of the government’s decisions. It is particularly critical of the cuts to the culture sector and the drawn-out decision-making process concerning the Estonia Theatre. It supports the Centre Party’s proposal for a public referendum, which indicates an oppositional stance.

Sharply criticizes the government's budget policy and the ministers' apparent incomprehension of the budget. Specific unjustified cuts (such as the police stations in Lasnamäe and Maardu) are highlighted as examples of the government's flawed decisions. The criticism is mainly policy-based, not personal.

It expresses clear opposition to the government's economic policy, particularly the tax hikes and the sale of state assets. It directly criticizes the continuation of the "tax spree" and the adoption of the budget, vowing to vote against it. The opposition is principled and uncompromising.

There is no direct opposition expressed; the speaker is rather posing a constructive question about potential problems during the system's implementation.

Expresses skepticism towards mining companies and their environmental protection promises. It indirectly criticizes the carrying out of studies, arguing that they are nothing more than a pretext for starting mining operations. The opposition is policy-driven rather than personal, focusing on environmental protection issues.

Sharply criticizes the governing coalition and its policies, accusing them of implementing taxes aimed at the poor and engaging in mere PR stunts. It claims that the coalition is using the pretext of security to justify unpopular taxes and may label the opposition as "enemies of the people." It supports the Centre Party's alternative tax proposals.

The speaker directly criticizes the government and its ministers, including the Prime Minister, accusing them of contradictory rhetoric concerning social cohesion. The criticism is substantive, focusing on the disconnect between the government's public promises and its actual policy implementation.

Expresses clear and principled opposition to the government's tax policy, criticizing its inconsistency and anti-public nature. The opposition is policy-centric, not personal, focusing on specific policy measures and their consequences.