By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

Supports allocating greater national funding for local government crisis preparedness, arguing that the current amount is insufficient. In the cultural sector, expresses concern regarding budget cuts and inquires about opportunities for increasing wages. Demonstrates support for public sector investments in critical fields.

Supports strict cost control and transparency in the public sector. It criticizes the government's inability to understand and control the budget, citing, for example, the "discovery" of 800 million euros at the end of the year. It demands that expenditures be proportionate and aligned with public interests.

It supports raising workers' wages in the railway sector and criticizes tax hikes, viewing them as measures that stifle the economy. It expresses concern regarding economic development and calls for measures to stimulate the economy. It is critical of the cheap sale of state assets.

Insufficient data.

There is insufficient data available to evaluate the economic views. We can indirectly infer a critical attitude toward industrial development that threatens the environment, but specific economic policy positions remain unclear.

Supports state borrowing as a means of reducing the national tax burden, asserting that "the whole world takes loans" and dismissing the Reform Party's aversion to debt as an "historical notion." The text criticizes excise tax hikes, calling them ineffective measures that harm lower-income groups and promote cross-border commerce. It demands analyses detailing the impact of taxes across various income brackets.

There is not enough data.

It supports lower taxes and public investment in infrastructure, especially road building during an economic crisis. It criticizes high energy prices, viewing them as an obstacle to competitiveness. Furthermore, it favors more expansive fiscal policies during crisis periods.