By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

Expresses concern regarding costs and socio-economic impact, specifically asking about expenditures and maintenance costs. Demands a transparent analysis regarding the use of resources. Does not express clear positions on taxes, regulation, or trade, but demonstrates a responsible approach to the use of public funds.

Expresses concern regarding tax hikes, the budget deficit, and the use of borrowed money to achieve economic growth. Stresses the importance of competitiveness and attracting investment. Indicates a preference for economic policies with a lower tax burden and is critical of the government’s fiscal decisions. Supports a more business-friendly approach.

A strongly social-democratic economic perspective, sharply criticizing the tax reform which, in their estimation, favors the wealthy and harms the poorer segments of the population. They advocate for a more progressive tax policy and a greater role for the state in guaranteeing social justice. Furthermore, concern is expressed regarding the plight of minimum wage earners and pensioners.

Demands a clear state funding model when imposing new obligations, emphasizing the fair distribution of the burden among the state, local governments, and businesses. It supports a greater role for the state in financing school catering to alleviate the financial burden on local governments and parents. It criticizes the government solely for raising taxes.

It supports increasing the revenue base for local municipalities and criticizes the government's tax hikes. It calls for a systemic approach to wage growth in the cultural sector and adequate funding for essential public services, such as school meals. It emphasizes the necessity of balanced and sustainable financing.

The text supports a greater financial commitment from the state to ensure the crisis preparedness of local municipalities, while criticizing the allocation of 3 million euros as inadequate. It recognizes the necessity of investing in better working conditions for young people through youth work camps (student brigades) and similar initiatives. It also acknowledges that imposing additional obligations on businesses results in costs that are ultimately passed on to consumers.

It clearly advocates for reducing the tax burden and pursuing more business-friendly policies. It criticizes the government for introducing new taxes at a time when the state actually has a budget surplus. It stresses the necessity of boosting people's purchasing power and increasing business confidence. Furthermore, it supports lowering VAT on basic necessities, particularly food, following the example set by other European countries.

It prefers investing in local labor rather than importing foreign labor. It expresses concern over social tensions that could arise from high levels of immigration. It supports long-term investments in training people as a more economically sound approach.

There is not enough data.