By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

The patterns of activity are limited to asking questions during the debate on the bill and delivering a longer speech at the plenary session. Questions are directed both to the rapporteur and the previous speaker, demanding information regarding government reports and clearances. Data is lacking concerning other events or regular interaction.

Records exist for only one appearance at a plenary session, where participation occurred in a discussion on the topic of e-voting by asking a question.

All three speeches were delivered on the same day during the plenary session and focused on a single topic: the draft motor vehicle tax bill. This pattern of activity indicates active participation in the legislative debate, presenting both general criticism and specific questions regarding exemptions.

There is insufficient data.

There is too little data.

Speaking activity was concentrated on a single day of the plenary session (03.11.2025). The pattern demonstrates continuity, as reference is made to an earlier question posed to the Minister of Social Affairs in February or March, indicating long-term monitoring of the subject. The speaker is an active questioner, submitting detailed and critical follow-up questions to the rapporteurs.