By Plenary Sessions: Marko Mihkelson

Opponents are sharply criticized, with the criticism of the bill being labeled as criticism of the Estonian state itself. The criticism is aimed at those who question the validity or constitutionality of the bill, despite the Constitutional Committee having completed thorough work. Furthermore, opponents are reproached for forgetting Russia’s true objectives.

The speaker does not directly criticize any domestic counterpart, but neutrally mentions the question raised by colleague Põlluaas concerning international attention. The primary confrontation is directed against Russia's aggression and the violation of international law.